> On Aug 3, 2018, at 09:50, Salz, Rich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As chairs, you can appoint a new author.
We know that. The interest in the document seems to be almost exclusively the two persons involved that cannot seem to reach consensus, which is why we are asking those two people to resolve their issues and/or find others interested in moving the document towards consensus. Paul > > On 8/2/18, 3:37 PM, "Melinda Shore" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, all: > > Paul and I discussed the status of the threat document and > agree that it is not appropriate for chairs to make changes > to the content of working group documents in the absence of > working group consensus. We've been deadlocked on the > threat analysis document for several years now, and while > we would very much like for the parties who disagree to > find a compromise, and for the document to be published, it > does not weaken the protocol document if it is not. So, if > the authors and those who have issues with the current text > cannot find some compromise text before the working group > shuts down, the document will not be published as a working > group document. The authors, of course, are free to > pursue publication through alternative processes should they > continue to be unable to arrive at a compromise. > > Melinda > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans > > > _______________________________________________ > Trans mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans _______________________________________________ Trans mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trans
