The only typo is HL02=21. It should have said HL03=21. In that example what they are saying is that when the servicing provider is the trading partner then the provider is both the information receiver at level 21 and the provider at level 19.
Sending two 19's as you propose results in a non-compliance error. First off your provider level HL's won't have a receiver level to point to in the HL02. Both would have to point to the source level or one to the other provider and that one to the source. Either way the mandated structure is hosed. -----Original Message----- From: Cindy Gerber To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Sent: 10/8/02 3:21 PM Subject: RE: Information Receiver in 276 vs 270 I should have clarified this in my first post - it might make it easier. On page 25 of the implementation guide, v4010, The 3rd paragraph refers to the value of HL03 for the info requester and service provider. There appears to be a typographical error as the last 2 sentences don't make sense. I asked about this at a local meeting we have to discuss transactions (HCIM). We interpreted this to mean that if the requester is also the provider, HL03 should be valued with "19" at both the requester and provider levels. If the requester is not the servicing provider, the HL03 value for the info requester would be "21", and the value for the service provider level would be "19". Hope this helps! Cindy Gerber MCare, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Cindy Gerber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 3:03 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Information Receiver in 276 vs 270 My understanding is that the information receiver can be a clearinghouse, provider, provider group, employer, etc. If the information is requested via a clearinghouse, on behalf of a provider, the response still goes back to the requester (clearinghouse) who would then have to pass the information back to the provider. The information source is the payer. Cindy Gerber MCare, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Sparma, Deborah, nashccon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:38 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Information Receiver in 276 vs 270 Can anyone clarify the who the information receiver is in the 276. The 270 defines the Information Receiver as the entity who is asking the questions - physician, hospital another insurer. So if the transaction is being sent through a clearinghouse, I understand this to mean that the information receiver is NOT the clearinghouse information. I thought I could apply this same logic in the 276, however, the 276 defines the information receiver as the entity who is expecting the response from the information source - provider, employer or clearinghouse. Therefore, I understand this to mean that if a provider sends the 276 transaction through a clearinghouse, then the information receiver would actually be the clearinghouse information, not the provider who is actually the one asking the claim status request. I would like to use the Information Receiver information in the 276 the same way as in the 270, but I don't know if I can. Does anyone else have a point of view? Thanks, Deborah Sparma ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited. The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. ********************************************************************** To be removed from this list, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that it may take up to 72 hours to process your request. ====================================================== The WEDI SNIP listserv to which you are subscribed is not moderated. The discussions on this listserv therefore represent the views of the individual participants, and do not necessarily represent the views of the WEDI Board of Directors nor WEDI SNIP. If you wish to receive an official opinion, post your question to the WEDI SNIP Issues Database at http://snip.wedi.org/tracking/. Posting of advertisements or other commercial use of this listserv is specifically prohibited.
