On Tuesday 28 August 2007 23:05, Francesco Romani wrote: > > Hi, > > While I'm almost totally devoted to work on 1.1.0, I'm wondering about > best policy to properly `backport' changes to HEAD. > A little question here: Why is HEAD and 1.1.0 different? I thought that HEAD is the cutting-edge in transcode development and 1.1.0 is the newest, yet to be released version of transcode (also cutting-edge). When 1.1.0 is released, it is of course a separate branch, but until then...?
Greetings, Thomas
