>> > While I'm almost totally devoted to work on 1.1.0, I'm wondering about
>> > best policy to properly `backport' changes to HEAD.
>> A little question here:
>> Why is HEAD and 1.1.0 different?
>
>First and foremost I must point out that I had very likely done a
>questionable choice from project management viewpoint.
>I've chosen to branch 1.1.0 very early: we already have a separate 1.1.0
>branch, and I'm already working on it.
Yes, that's probably not the way I'd have done it. As a rule, I leave
HEAD == latest version at all times (even after a .0 release), and only
branch the old version when I want to start making changes toward a new
version (that won't be included in the stable release).
Then again, given my, uh, minimal contributions lately, what I think may
not be relevant. (:
--Andrew Church
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://achurch.org/
