Is there a reason that you did not just get a list rather than using objects to begin with, or just write plain jane SQL statements to get what you need? Raw SQL is still one of the fastest ways to get data from the database, objects and tql are really (imo) when you want your rich business object logic attached, or when you want to make use of the cache or relationships. If you just need a query, then <cfquery> can be your best friend (put it in an object decorator, which is still a great way to toss that logic around)
Chris Peterson On 6/15/09 3:52 PM, "Dan O'Keefe" <[email protected]> wrote: > I am sure this must have been discussed already, but a search did not yield > any results. > > I was looking for a UDF to convert an array of transfer objects to a query. I > was looking at http://cflib.org/udf/arrayOfObjectsToQuery which uses the CF > getMetaData() function and is looking for getter functions. But, I am trying > to use it in a TO o2m array, the getmetaData only returns the functions in the > decorator. > > Anyone know of such an animal? I know there are other ways to return the query > via transfer, but this one intrigued me. > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
