Yeah... I'm curious about the use case as well! ;o) What's the reason? Mark
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:57 AM, Chris Peterson <[email protected]>wrote: > Is there a reason that you did not just get a list rather than using > objects to begin with, or just write plain jane SQL statements to get what > you need? Raw SQL is still one of the fastest ways to get data from the > database, objects and tql are really (imo) when you want your rich business > object logic attached, or when you want to make use of the cache or > relationships. If you just need a query, then <cfquery> can be your best > friend (put it in an object decorator, which is still a great way to toss > that logic around) > > Chris Peterson > > > On 6/15/09 3:52 PM, "Dan O'Keefe" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am sure this must have been discussed already, but a search did not yield > any results. > > I was looking for a UDF to convert an array of transfer objects to a query. > I was looking at http://cflib.org/udf/arrayOfObjectsToQuery which uses the > CF getMetaData() function and is looking for getter functions. But, I am > trying to use it in a TO o2m array, the getmetaData only returns the > functions in the decorator. > > Anyone know of such an animal? I know there are other ways to return the > query via transfer, but this one intrigued me. > > Thanks, > > Dan > > > > > > > > -- E: [email protected] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
