On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Don Quist <[email protected]>wrote:
> http://www.cflib.org/udf/arrayOfObjectsToQuery > > I always prefer to use objects, but recently I worked on a project where > all kinds of remote access was required. json, wddx, amf, etc. Since > cfc's have a hard time getting serialized, and when objects have extensive > inheritance, wddx conversion gets bloated. I came up with the above > function that I didn't end up using because I didn't like the eval. > > In anycase, I was thinking you could thread out a job to convert the array > of objects to a cfquery then cache it. Maybe setup an event, whenever an > object is modified and saved, update the cached object as well? > Hi Don, My initial post regarding this subject mentioned your UDF. The issue I had when using it with Transfer is the getMetadata call returns the functions in the decorator, so it does not return the getters needed to work. If I was over riding all of my getters and setters in the decorator it would work, but otherwise it would not. Insightful UDF though. Thanks, Dan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
