Having already experienced strange behavior with Transfer and CF9 "local", I just wanted to rule that out. Although, as I look at the leak suspects report in the eclipse memory analyzer, I see references to "instanceFacade.cfc","eventManager.cfc", and "transfer.cfc" so I might be focusing too low level.
Maybe I'll switch to 1.1 from pluggable cache and see how long that lasts. If same setup + 1.1 is stable, then cause would be isolated to pluggable cache. - Gabriel > > coldfusion.runtime.LocalScope is not related to the new local scope in > CF9. It's just a class that gets used for lots of scopes in CF. What > are the actual variables that are hanging around in memory? That's > more important than the coldfusion.runtime.Variable wrappers that > you're seeing. > > -- > Before posting questions to the group please read: > http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "transfer-dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en > -- Before posting questions to the group please read: http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev/web/how-to-ask-support-questions-on-transfer You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "transfer-dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/transfer-dev?hl=en
