Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 12:34:26PM +0400, Rail Aliev wrote: > >>>>> "NF" == Nicolas François <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > NF> If you think PyLucene is useful, I can ask for its inclusion in > NF> Debian. > > AFAIR, there was some problems regarding binary format of jars supplied > by upstream (PyLucene). See > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256283
Yes. The Debian package should use a jar generated from source (or provided by another binary package). I would like to see if the package will be usable and useful before looking a that point. > NF> Just report here if it worked and if it was useful for Pootle. > > It worked after upgrade from previous version (1.9.x). Search worked > well but when I tried to rebuild index new pylucene generated empty (20 > bytes) index files (manually and automatically from web). :( Thanks for trying. I will have a deeper look. Can you describe the method for rebuilding the index (manually and automatically from web). Also, did you try 2.0.0-3 or 2.1.0-1? > So, after my first test I can say that upgrading to PyLucene 2 with your > patches for Pootle brakes indexing. ;( Kind Regards, -- Nekral ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
