>>>> This got me thinking. Is this something we should consider doing?
>>>> I mean, contribute our translations of Pootle and Virtaal, for example, to
>>>> Open-Tran (or some other similar project).
>>>
>>> I think a TM server should be created. Open-Tran is a good aproach,
>>> from the web interface point of view. But I think that a TM server
>>> should offer more than this. The integration with desktop CAT tools is
>>> imperative (and also web based CAT tools, of course). I give some
>>> ideas about this on a reply to a post on the Dwayne Bailey blog (which
>>> is not published yet), but I forgot the web interface (Open-tran if
>>> you want).
>
> http://www.translate.org.za/blogs/dwayne/content/libtranslate-tm-plugins-and-virtaal
>
> I also added my comments as a reply.
I sent a new reply with some new suggestions and ideas. If you could
approve it...
>>> A good terminology server and a good TM server are very necessary on
>>> the free software translation world. And also its integration with the
>>> existing CAT tools.
>
> Its the last part that for me is the most important, integration.
Yes. In the last days I read some texts about translation and some of
them say that the quality in the translation is first achieved having
very good glossaries than with good TMs.
Bye,
Leandro Regueiro
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Translate-pootle mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
