Hi Arky, thanks for the input. ig., 2013.eko ekaren 09a 14:14(e)an, Arky(e)k idatzi zuen: > Hi, > > Thank you for bringing this up Julen. > > Let me suggest sticking to web standard design practices and try to be > browser agnostic. > > Pootle could deliver a light weight, fast loading web pages that are not > demanding on resources: Internet connectivity, fast hardware or minimum > screen resolution. And do progressive enhancement when possible using > more modern CSS3 elements such media queries. > > Such a web design can be easily displayed on older browsers and also > support newer mobile computing devices as well. > > Working on few pootle mock-ups for mobile-first design, will share them > when they are ready.
I have the impression (correct me if I'm wrong) that your message talks more about page load times, possible hardware limitations and mobile-oriented responsive designs. While the points you raise can be valid, the actual questions for this thread are: - Can you back up the N+N-1 version approach or do you have relevant data to warn us not to do that? - As an exception to that approach, should we support/ditch IE 8 or not? Julen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
