You are perfectly right about the genders. It renders the whole thing unserious and useless. I'm not too sure that *most* alphabets don't have capitals (in fact, only comparatively few don't) but that is a lesser problem there.
On 30 October 2012 08:25, Philippe Verdy <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes but most of the typos were imported by a bot... the source of this > is not known. > > I've not seen these many typos last year. > > 2012/10/29 Federico Leva (Nemo) <[email protected]>: > > Historyh works as usual: > > > https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Research:Wikipedia_Editor_Survey_August_2012/Questions/fr&action=history > > > http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl?lang=meta.wikimedia&page=Research%3AWikipedia+Editor+Survey+August+2012%2FQuestions%2Ffr > > (but original translations by the bot come from the previous edition, if > I > > remember correctly). > > Feedback to the authors of bad translations is surely useful; thanks for > > fixes. > > _______________________________________________ > Translators-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l >
_______________________________________________ Translators-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/translators-l
