From: [email protected] (Lars Poulsen)

Greetings to fellow TREG'ers ...

Two weeks ago, I asked a question about ISDN point-to-point operation
in the ETSI regime. I have not heard any feedback, so I wonder if
it got lost in transmission. I have tried to clarify the question,
and hope to hear from someone who has faced this issue and resolved it.

In the design of a CPE with multiple BRI ports (for the purposes of
this discussion, think of it as a small PBX with a handful of BRI
ports to the central office), we would like to derive timing for our
device's internal TDM bus from an arbitrarily selected BRI port.
With the ISDN circuits we are using, we find that when we select 
slave mode timing for the other BRI ports (meaning they get timing from
the bus in the box rather than from the BRI line), they become unable
to do D channel contention.

The lack of D-channel contention is not functionally crippling, it just
limits the device to point-to-point operation per ETS 300125 Annex A.
I am, however concerned that approval of equipment with such a restriction
may require a waiver that may not be portable across the EU.

Has anyone else encountered this problem ?
Would you be willing to discuss how you solved it ?

(The obvious workaround would be to put a FIFO between the BRI port 
and the TDM bus, and tell each BRI he's the master; but that seems like
a potentially large kludge.)

-- 
/ Lars Poulsen                  Internet E-mail: [email protected]
  OSICOM Technologies (Internet Business Unit, formerly RNS)
  7402 Hollister Avenue         Telefax:      +1-805-968-8256
  Santa Barbara, CA 93117       Telephone:    +1-805-562-3158

Reply via email to