Victor Your point is well taken. but we need both the "Global" aspects and the details of Technical aspects covered.
Thanks for your views, Frank At 11:55 AM 4/11/97 EDT, you wrote: >Tom, > > >for me, you are asking the wrong questions, but than that is for me. > >I am interested only in "general" regulatory and compliance issues, which is a >field >of its own in our global community. I don't have time to read all the good >stuff from >the techies on how they diddle modems to pass the UK requirements. > >I'm not saying that is not good and worthwhile stuff, but if you're trying to >track the >global regulations for Information and Communications Technology equipment, than >these details become chaff in the wind. You don't have time for it. > >I found that the EMC-PS forum had too much technical detail and not enough >information >to make it worth my while. I'm getting to a point where I start questioning the >value of >the TREG, if the trend for going down technical ratholes continues. > >Once again, I'm not saying that the technical stuff is not valuable, to the >contrary, in the >days that I had to get approvals for stuff, that would have been an invaluable >source. > >It is just that the, what I call "electro-political" part of this business has >grown to a size >that does notpermit sidetracking on finer technical points any longer. > >Hence your questionaire poses a problem for me. I am interested in the general >aspects >of all the fields you mention, BUT NOT FROM A TECHNICAL PERSPECTIVE. > >Thanks anyway for giving us an opportunity to express our thoughts on this. > > >Vic Boersma > >"WE NEVER ADMITTED BEING IGNORANT IN THE FIELDS WE WORKED" > >For a copy of our rates please hang on to your seat. > > >
