From: Frank McCaughey <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Public Utilities

The question of what constitutes 'buildings or sections of
buildings used for that purpose' in the exemption is also
interesting. Obviously, a CO is exempt. What of an equip-
ment room rented by the utility? What of a 'gimme' PBX =

room, where the building janitor sometimes stores his mop? =

What of wiring closets that don't take too much effort to =

get into?
You also have a secondary exemption in C22.1 Section 60, =

and I assume in article 800 of the NEC as well, exempting =

some equipment from inspection. When tied in to the =

requirement that equipment under the jurisdiction of an =

inspection department must be approved, you have a =

definitional quagmire.
However, common sense would dictate that no engineer, =

whether or not he works for a 'utility' would want to be
in a position where he would have to testify equipment for
which he was responsible didn't meet essential safety
requirements because it didn't have to.
Regards,
Frank McCaughey
Consultant

Reply via email to