I share the same opinion as "Matejic, Mirko".
"Open discussion on Calibration vendor audits is a hot topic for many Treg participants". Sometimes comments made by individuals are made without contributing substance relative to the question asked. We still welcomed and received it, without any complains. I suggest one persons comment should not discourage others treggers from participating in an open group discussion on this fourm regarding compliance issues. Many of us have received very valuable information from Treg. I would like to thank Treg members and other for their input to some of my questions on Treg. This is my personal opinion. Regards Christopher Saleem Senior Compliance Engineer Cisco Systems, Inc. >Reply-To: [email protected] > >Vic, > >Calibration vendor audits is a hot topic for many treg participants >from accredited EMC laboratories. > >By open discussion, valuable information would be made available >also to passive treg readers. The spirit of treg was to post and >publicly discuss issues. Only occasionally discussions were in >privacy with later posted summary. The dilemma was always when >to post results and cut further contributions. There were no complaints >in similar cases with many on-going threads, sometimes with minimum >contributions or with only humorous comments without contributing >substance relative to the scope of this distribution list. All these >contributions were welcomed and well received. We will live with it as >long as postings are not edited. > >Best Regards, > >Mirko Matejic > > ---------- >From: Victor L. Boersma >To: TREG >Subject: Re: Calibration Vendor Audits >Date: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 9:54AM > >Again, please conduct your business in privacy. Jon did provide his >email address so we don't have to sit through every lab that was >audited and did or did not cut it. Seems there is room for defamation >suits in this. > >Ciao, > >Vic
