Looks as if I may have started something with my comment. I did not summarize the results of the audit. I was only letting participants know that audits were going on by laboratories. I do not intend to pass my judgment of a calibration laboratory on to individuals over the internet. I will let NVLAP or A2LA assume the responsibility for approving calibration laboratories for general use by accredited laboratories. I would not depend upon another accredited lab to audit calibration laboratories for my use.
-----Original Message----- From: Christopher Saleem <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> List-Post: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 3:51 PM Subject: Re: Calibration Vendor Audits > > >I share the same opinion as "Matejic, Mirko". > >"Open discussion on Calibration vendor audits is a hot topic for many Treg >participants". > >Sometimes comments made by individuals are made without contributing >substance relative to the question asked. We still welcomed and received >it, without any complains. > >I suggest one persons comment should not discourage others treggers from >participating in an open group discussion on this fourm regarding >compliance issues. > >Many of us have received very valuable information from Treg. I would like >to thank Treg members and other for their input to some of my questions on >Treg. > >This is my personal opinion. > >Regards > > >Christopher Saleem >Senior Compliance Engineer >Cisco Systems, Inc. > >>Reply-To: [email protected] >> >>Vic, >> >>Calibration vendor audits is a hot topic for many treg participants >>from accredited EMC laboratories. >> >>By open discussion, valuable information would be made available >>also to passive treg readers. The spirit of treg was to post and >>publicly discuss issues. Only occasionally discussions were in >>privacy with later posted summary. The dilemma was always when >>to post results and cut further contributions. There were no complaints >>in similar cases with many on-going threads, sometimes with minimum >>contributions or with only humorous comments without contributing >>substance relative to the scope of this distribution list. All these >>contributions were welcomed and well received. We will live with it as >>long as postings are not edited. >> >>Best Regards, >> >>Mirko Matejic >> >> ---------- >>From: Victor L. Boersma >>To: TREG >>Subject: Re: Calibration Vendor Audits >>Date: Wednesday, August 05, 1998 9:54AM >> >>Again, please conduct your business in privacy. Jon did provide his >>email address so we don't have to sit through every lab that was >>audited and did or did not cut it. Seems there is room for defamation >>suits in this. >> >>Ciao, >> >>Vic >
