I took your meaning to be NON-DISK ipod. When you buy a nano, you get what you get - and no expansion. I bought my wife a 4 Gig nano a while back, but now her recently modified Treo 650 has 8 GB of SDHC. She doesn't use the nano anymore - especially with the recent acquisition of her BlueSpoon Spider Bluetooth headset. :-) Who knows what the next "hack" will bring.
- Jim > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:06 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Treo] Re: SDHC speed test > > OK, the largest i-pod nano :( thanks Mr. Froehle. (I knew that was too > good to be true.) > > Anyway, i think the rebate ended 2/20, but I got it for $56 with $15 > rebate at newegg...where all the geeks shop. > > > > > Where did you get a 8GB card for $36 > > > > On 2/22/07, wmotzing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Just letting you all know I got the 8GB SDHC card. It works great on > >> my 700P following the previous guidelines. Just remember to do a soft > >> reset. ; ) > >> > >> Also, if you have Softick Card Export II:, or mocean music player you > >> needn't bother with card readers and such. > >> > >> I can't believe my Treos now got the same capacity as the largest > >> ipod. Pretty cool and for $36..... > >> > >> --- In [email protected] <treo%40yahoogroups.com>, "Craig Froehle" < > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > >> > SanDisk trades off speed for stability and durability, something a > lot > >> > of people are interested in. Personally, I want speed AND stability. > >> > ;-) > >> > > >> > > >> > On 2/17/07, Michael M. Rye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > I do consider my SanDisk Ultra-II 2GB card to be a bit > >> > > slow. It's the slowest with random, small file access. > >> > > When writing large sequential files, it does live up to > >> > > its speed ratings. My next card will probably be > >> > > another 2GB card, either SanDisk Extreme-III or an ATP > >> > > card based on the speed testing results. > >> > > > >> > > -- > >> > > Mike > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Sandro Campos Mancini wrote: > >> > > > Actually, I've always considered Sandisk to be slow. > >> > > > > >> > > > Only the Ultra series are OK. > >> > > > > >> > > > And beware of 150x, 60x, etc. claims. Most of them are just > >> BOGUS claims. > >> > > > There's an blog post from a columnist (George Ou) from ZDNET (I > >> think) > >> > > > talking about this, the FAKE speed claims manufacturers make. > >> > > > > >> > > > [ ] s > >> > > > Sandro Campos Mancini > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> > > > From: "Michael M. Rye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > > To: <[email protected] <treo%40yahoogroups.com>> > >> > > > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 2:49 PM > >> > > > Subject: Re: [Treo] SDHC speed test > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> Thank you for the link! I was particularly surprised by the > >> slowness of > >> > > >> the Sandisk cards. I guess I'll be looking at ATP for my next > >> one. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> --- > >> > > >> Michael > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Yahoo! Groups Links > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > http://www.GearBits.com <http://www.gearbits.com/> -- Tech. Culture. > >> Ideas. Opinions. > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Srivaths Srinivasan > > "Kahan Kahan Se Guzar Aaye" > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups - Join or create groups, clubs, forums & communities. > Links > > > >
