Well, it's all about all of us. This is a pretty high-traffic list. Many people, like me, are on 30-40 such lists. I don't own a 680, never going to own a 680, so knowing in advance that a post is 680-specific would help a lot.
-------------------- "In my lifetime, we've gone from Eisenhower to George W. Bush, from John Kennedy to Albert Gore. Now if that is evolution, I believe that in about 12 years, we're gonna be voting for plants." --Comedian Lewis Black ...... Original Message ....... On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:53:41 -0400 Bill Gamble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >So it's all about "you", then. ;-) >______ >Bill > >...... Original Message ....... >On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 13:45:02 -0400 Scandals & Animals ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>It wouldn't change the fact that various models are discussed. But if I >>think the 680 stuff is irrelevant to me and wastes my time, this would >>allow me to concentrate only on the 650 and 700 stuff and the general and >>all stuff. Everything else would still be here for anyone who wants to >>read it. >> >> >> >> >>-------------------- >>"In my lifetime, we've gone from Eisenhower to George W. Bush, from John >>Kennedy to Albert Gore. Now if that is evolution, I believe that in about >>12 years, we're gonna be voting for plants." >> >>--Comedian Lewis Black >> >>...... Original Message ....... >>On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 10:49:38 -0400 Bill Sheehan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>wrote: >>>I respectfully disagree and decline. I prefer our quiet jumble than >>>a bunch of self-appointed Linneauses creating artificial categories. >>> >>>-- Bill >>> >>>On Mar 14, 2007, at 10:37 AM, Scandals & Animals wrote: >>> >>>> How about we start including in the subject line, right at the >>>> beginning, >>>> the model of Treo that the post is about? Question about a 680? The >>>> proper subject line would be "680: <remainder of subject>." Same >>>> goes for >>>> the 650, 700, etc. A general question could be preceeded by >>>> "general" or >>>> "all." >>>> >>>> Howboutit? > > >
