Sandro, you probably know this already, but it's not about the megapixels!  
It's more about the sensor size, sensor quality, and the optics (lens) than 
resolution.  Resolution is important when you want to print large images.  A 
1-megapixel camera will not make very good  8x10 (let alone larger) prints, but 
once you get to 3-6MP, it shouldn't matter.  Even poster-sized images can look 
really good with a good 6MP source image...
 
Levi
 
 
Levi Wallach 
Blog: twelveblackcodemonkeys.com <http://twelveblackcodemonkeys.blog-city.com/> 
DVD Review Site: dvdmon.com <http://www.dvdmon.com/> 
Pictures at: http://wallachexpressions.smugmug.com/Levi 
<http://wallachexpressions.smugmug.com/Levi> 

________________________________

From: [email protected] on behalf of Sandro Campos Mancini
Sent: Wed 5/9/07 11:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Treo] Re: 755p



Amazingly, people are still able to be disappointed by Palm. Can't you guys 
finally understand they're marinating us slowly in bullshit-land until the REAL 
next Treo comes in the 3rd or 4th semester? Just plain forget getting something 
truly NEW using PalmOS 5.

That being said it still amazes me how Palm dares to recycle for so long old 
technology... I can imagine the fanfare they'll make once they offer a 
two-megapixel camera in a cell phone. By then, 4 or 5 will be standard in other 
smartphones and 2 and 3 megapixel will come in low-cost camera phones. And 
guess what... It will STILL take crappy photos. :-(

[]s,
Sandro Campos Mancini


-----Original Message-----
From: "Don Ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 3:13 am
Subject: RE: [Treo] Re: 755p
To: <[email protected]>Reply-To: [email protected]

I know I'm responding to my own post, but I am just SO profoundly
>disappointed.  I feel like I was promised a pony and got, well, you
>know.  Now, where did I leave that shoe scraper. 
>
>I'm going to go drink/cry myself to sleep and dream of better days.
>
>Here's to MINI SD cards, inferior in every way but weight.  Well, they hold 
>less, but they make up for it by being more expensive. . .
>
>Cheers,
>Don




Yahoo! Groups Links







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to