Jeffrey: I wasn't joking. Given comparable usage my 680 lasts a lot longer than the 700p . I am in the Tampa area, where VZW has good coverage so searching for a cell tower shouldn't have been a problem. So far the 680 definitely seems better. Even with fairly extensive usage of the camera on a recent trip to Europe it did fine.
On 9/2/07, Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm pretty happy with the Treo 680 battery. To me it's comparable to the > > TX. > --- > Roger Prokic > Baltimore, Maryland USA > > -=[ This email was sent from a Palm Treo 680 palm computer using > SnapperMail Enterprise Edition v2.3.7.01 ]=- > > ...... Original Message ....... > > On Sun, 02 Sep 2007 20:09:09 -0400 Jeffrey Kaplan <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<yahoo%40gordol.org>> > wrote: > >Hello, srivaths srinivasan. > > > >On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 19:06:37 -0400 you said: > > > >> Having used the 700p on Verizon, my advice to stay away from it. It is > a > >> very serious battery hog, even with the Seidio battery I had difficulty > >> getting thru a day. I have since moved to a 680(on ATT/Cingular) which > >> appears to be a lot better on the battery front. > > > >You've got to be joking. The 680 has the worst battery life of any > >Palm device I've ever seen. It's also got the smallest battery of any > >rechargeable Palm device. > > > >The only thing I can think of to reconcile that is that your 700p from > >VZW was having a hard time with the signal. > > > >-- > >Jeffrey Kaplan www.gordol.org > >The from userid is killfiled Send personal mail to gordol > > > >"Wars can be prevented just as surely as they can be provoked, and we > >who fail to prevent them must share in the guilt for the dead." - > >General Omar Bradley > > > > > > > -- Srivaths Srinivasan "Kahan Kahan Se Guzar Aaye" [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
