Speaking in generalities, here's how the big three stack up: Palm - PDA that evolved into an excellent phone and email device Blackberry - email device that evolved into an excellent phone and good PDA WM6 - a mish-mash of everything, none of which it does very well.
:-) But seriously folks, generally/historically if you want solid PDA/phone you get Palm, email/phone you get blackberry, and if you're out of your mind you get WM6. OK, maybe only sort of seriously. I think I heard Roger got a Blackberry and might be happy with it. Even though I don't miss graffiti with the Treo's keyboard, I would VERY MUCH miss the touch screen if I went to a BB. If PalmOS went away altogether, I'd get a Blackberry. Cheers, Don -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2007 4:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [Treo] Re: Treo 680 vs 650? How do you like the Blackberry as a PDA though? I was shying away from it for that reason (I will not be using email). Agunat --- In [email protected], "Roger Prokic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The 680 does have good reception, but I found I always had a few dropouts going to work. With my Blackberry I don't have any dropouts now. > > Roger > --- > Roger Prokic > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:09:45 > To:[email protected] > Subject: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650? > > > I love the Palm system but had to get rid of my Treo 650 because of > poor reception. I understand the 680 is supposed to have significantly > better reception. Is this the case? Any other differences worth > mentioning? > > Agunat > Yahoo! Groups Links
