Roger, I'll remember to look for your posts here and, hopefully, on [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I get my BB.
-- Larry Hess, CPA | Albuquerque, NM On 12/23/07, Roger Prokic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry guys. I'm a die hard palm fanatic since palm was born, and now I > have found the Blackberry to aid the palm quirks I've had to deal with for > quite some time. > > I am only sharing my experience. > > Roger > --- > Roger Prokic > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T > > -----Original Message----- > From: "john.messeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:06:25 > To:[email protected] > Subject: Re: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650? > > > My 680 has been vastly superior to my 650 in at least two ways: > = 680 can consistently make calls, with fewer bars, than the 650. I > don't know the actual technical reason, but it seems to lock weaker > signals much better than the 650. > = it seems more stable than the 650, even before I installed the > custom ROM - which made it measurably faster. > > (I've gotta say this: It does seem a little tacky on a Treo forum to > answer a Treo question with a promo for Blackberry.) > > > On 12/22/2007 at 1725 -0500 > "Roger Prokic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > The 680 does have good reception, but I found I always had a few > dropouts going to work. With my Blackberry I don't have any dropouts now. > > > > Roger > > --- > > Roger Prokic > > Sent wirelessly via BlackBerry 8820 by AT&T > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 22:09:45 > > To:[email protected] > > Subject: [Treo] Treo 680 vs 650? > > > > > > I love the Palm system but had to get rid of my Treo 650 because of > > poor reception. I understand the 680 is supposed to have significantly > > better reception. Is this the case? Any other differences worth > > mentioning? > > > > Agunat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
