On 2/25/08, Jeffrey Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So often it isn't the only criteria. And I think that 90% figure is way too high.
I'm all for development without barriers > Hello, L. > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:53:04 -0500 you said: > > > But guess which platforms have the most software. > > Over 90% of the software available for the Palm is crap. Over 90% of > that crap is badly written. > > Which 90% is crap depends on what you're looking for, of course... > > > Signed vs Unsigned software is like regulared vs free-market economies. > > in a way. > > It's also a way to ensure that badly written software won't crash the > devices. So long as that's the only criteria used to determine if the > software gets signed or not by Palm (or Apple, or MS, or Symbian...) > then I see no problem. > -- ============================== War Eagle
