Trade UP?  To me this feels like a Pre-light.  It's kind of the Pre Centro.
Basically the same thing but smaller.  The big thing for me would be the
smaller screen.  As it is, the Pre screen is smaller than the iPhone's and
in general (especially as I get older!) I really want something that's easy
to see and not something I have to squint at.  Smaller screeens with less
resolution mean either more squinting, more sliding/scrolling, or both.
They keyboard on the outside is a double-edged sword.  Nice for
accessibilty, but necessitating a smaller screen.  Mainly I see this as a
supplement to the Pre, a younger brother (or sister?) that will appeal to
perhaps a younger demographic?  The big risk for Palm is diluting the Pre's
brand.  There's just one iPhone.  There's no iPhone Mini or iPhone Nano like
there is/was in iPods.  Not all companies can have one type of phone.  And
this is certainly not the ridiculousness of HTC or Nokia who have so many
models (which also are named differently for each carrier) that it's hard to
count them, but there's also something to be said for simplicity.  I realize
this was probably unveiled now to try to restart some buzz about Palm and
the Pre, and again, RIGHT before a big Apple event, so maybe also to try to
steal some of Apple's thunder (although I don't think they are supposed to
be coming out with any new iPhones, just new iPods).  Still I think they
could have also waited till around Thanksgiving which might have given them
a lot more holiday-oriented buzz?


Levi Wallach
tweet me @dvdmon


On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Michael M. Rye <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hey, I like this one!  My Pre has the dreaded Oreo syndrome.
> Hopefully I'll be able to trade up from my Pre for the Pixi!
>
> ---
> Michael
>
>
> On 9/8/2009 11:23 PM, Craig Froehle wrote:
> > http://is.gd/33HkC
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > My first reaction was "hey, where'd the button go?"
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to