Vishal Uday Sheth wrote: > googlegroups are good. I have few of my groups there. I've moved my > yahoogroups to googlegroups. It's good. > > I strongly disagree.
Google Groups are nowhere near as good as Yahoo groups. I would not recommend trying to switch over there. Sam > Vishal Sheth > > > > > On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Jim Griffin wrote: > > >> Would Google groups be better? Maybe we could create a group there, and send >> a notice to everyone to join? Also perhaps put an autoresponder for >> stragglers? >> >> Has anyone tried Google groups? >> >> Jim >> (Via Palm Pre) >> On Apr 29, 2010 6:08 AM, Michael M. Rye <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> That's nothing. I've had Yahoo messages take as long as two or even >> >> three _days_ to turnaround onto the list. Their Email list systems >> >> are really F'ed up sometimes. >> >> -- >> >> Michael >> >> On 4/29/2010 12:29 AM, Don Ferguson wrote: >> >> > BTW, I received this email from the group almost 6 hours later than I >> sent >> >> > it. What gives Yahoo??? Even for free, we deserve better turnaround than >> >> > that!! >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > >> >> > Don >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Don >> >> > Ferguson >> >> > Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 5:24 PM >> >> > To: Treo Yahoo Groups >> >> > Subject: RE: [Treo] HP buys Palm >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > I've always liked buying HP electronic devices since my first HP45 >> >> > calculator. And of course, I've had nearly every Palm device since the >> >> > Pilot 1000. >> >> > >> >> > SO, I should be happy! I'm not quite. Palm's hardware quality has been >> >> > mediocre at best in recent years. Other than printers, so has HP's. I >> >> > never buy their desktop or laptop computers for my clients unless I >> >> > absolutely have to, preferring the hardware quality of Lenovo (for >> laptops) >> >> > and Dell (for desktops). HP is third. >> >> > >> >> > Still in all, a good thing, I suppose. Perhaps HP just sees itself >> >> > competing in the computer arena with the crappy hardware product >> quality of >> >> > Toshiba and the other retail systems, and for the world of mobile >> they'll >> >> > see themselves competing (as they will be) with Apple and HTC, both of >> whom >> >> > have better hardware product quality (not Apple computers, which are >> just as >> >> > mediocre as Toshiba, but in the area of mobile devices, Apple is first >> >> > rate). >> >> > >> >> > Maybe? >> >> > >> >> > But not this year, I fear. Unless they've been talking longer than we >> know, >> >> > which is possible. Maybe HP has a smartphone and a tablet all revved up >> and >> >> > ready for WebOS? >> >> > >> >> > But, the Evo is calling . . . >> >> > >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > >> >> > Don >> >> > >> >> > . . . snip . . . >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ------------------------------------ >> >> > >> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] >> >> >> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
