Stig, Thank you very much for your review. I'm also forwarding it to trill so that the WG can see it.
Regards, Alia On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Stig Venaas <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > Sorry for being a bit late with this review. At least the document is > well written and easy to understand. There are no significant issues. > > I am wondering about the security considerations though. Are there > really no differences between the multi-level alternatives when it > comes to security? > > I have two tiny editorial comments. > > Section 1.4 typo > RBridge - Routing Bridge, an alterntive name for a TRILL switch > ^^^^^^^^^ > > Also, several places it says "non-zero" which is correct, but there > are some instances of "nonzero". > > Stig > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Hardwick > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Stig > > > > > > > > Please would you do a routing directorate QA review of > > draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel? > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-rbridge-multilevel/ > > > > > > > > Note that this is a “QA review.” The document is still being worked on by > > the TRILL working group. The goal of this review is to provide a > different > > perspective on the work and to improve its quality. Hence, your comments > > will be provided primarily for the benefit of the TRILL chairs and the > > document authors. > > > > > > > > Please could you provide your comments by May 20 and copy your comments > to > > the rtg-dir list? > > > > > > > > The following web page contains a briefing on the QA process, and > guidance > > for the QA reviewer. > > > > https://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDirDocQa > > > > > > > > Please let me know whether you can do it, or not. > > > > > > > > Many thanks > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ trill mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/trill
