On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:56:24AM -0500, Magnus Hedemark wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, John Franklin wrote: > > > Rich text mail, OTOH, provides all the features people want in their > > mail (fonts, italics, large print, embedded images) without coming even > > close to allowing for executable content. > > > > Rich text mail is readable by most (if not all) modern mail clients, > > including text based ones like mutt. > > If you sent this in rich text, then I must disagree; your message was > completely indistinguishable from what you were quoting (it was not > preceeded by any quote character).
Weird. Mutt shows it preceeded with one or more greater-than (>) quote symbols. Although the text/enriched and text/plain do differ slightly in layout, they both have the quotes. What mailer do you use? jf -- John Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICBM: N37 12'54", W80 27'14" Z+2100' -- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
