However, the original message stated, "So we're gonna get this through the 17th ! arg! "
My comments were in response to this statement, not a defense of the out of office being sent to the list. I was simply pointing out that we may not have continued to recieve the messages if the user had not been set to no email delivery on the maillist server.
My response was a technical comment, nothing more, nothing less.
Also, thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for posting the reference to http://www.goldmark.org/netrants/auto-resp/
I hadn't seen that page before. It has some good info and history in it.
Tom
Christopher L Merrill wrote:
Tom Woods wrote:
Not to defend the auto-respond to the maillist... But.....
For example; I am required to set an out of office (OoO) when I am
> going to be, well... Out of the office. Unfortunately, this will reply
> to mailing lists as well as individulas. However, it doesn't reply to
With all due respect...that is not OUR problem. The people in question
should login to their trilug mailman account and temporarily suspend their
mail delivery. Ignorance is no excuse. If I can figure it out...so can
they.
C
-- TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/ TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/ TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
