On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 23:09, Tom Woods wrote:
> Not to defend the auto-respond to the maillist... But.....
>
> For example; I am required to set an out of office (OoO) when I am
> going to be, well... Out of the office. Unfortunately, this will reply
> to mailing lists as well as individulas. However, it doesn't reply to
> every email. Once the OoO is sent to a recipient, that recipient is
> tagged, and subsequent messages from that address are not replied to.
> So, worst case scenario, the list gets one OoO message.
Well, actually, any responsibly written Out-of-Office message will never
do either of these two things:
* Should never respond to messages when the recipient is not listed in
the To: or CC: field. This should eliminate responses to mailing list
posts, and this procedure has been followed by the "vacation" program in
Unix for decades.
* Should never respond to the "Reply-To:" field but rather the Sender:
address, or if there is no Sender:, the From:. This will eliminate any
automatic responses going the list itself (instead they would go to the
message's poster).
Also, OoO agents should ignore messages with Precedence: set to "bulk"
or "list" which many mailing list software packages do.
E-mail is not a new thing... it was around long before the Web exploded
the popularity of the Internet. There is really no excuse for software
developers who can't write a sane vacation autoresponder.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc
