Unfortunately when I made my 17th ! arg! comment, another OoO message hit the
list in response to it, so I beleive this person's would have continued had
Tanner not made the change that he did.  Either way, I agree with previous
comments, OoO should be configured to not send to the list or the person should
unsubscribe.  Heck I use my Yahoo! account for this, I wish I could stop their
silly tag... *sigh*

thanks,
David M.

--- Tom Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I couldn't agree more!
> 
> However, the original message stated, "So we're gonna get this through 
> the 17th ! arg! "
> 
> My comments were  in response to this statement, not a defense of the 
> out of office being sent to the list.  I was simply pointing out that we 
> may not have continued to recieve the messages if the user had not been 
> set to no email delivery on the maillist server.
> 
<snip>

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
-- 
TriLUG mailing list        : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ  : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
TriLUG PGP Keyring         : http://trilug.org/~chrish/trilug.asc

Reply via email to