because it's more expensive, has fewer features, and their customer
service is abyssmal. come to think of it, maybe i should have given it
a -3...
Ben Pitzer wrote:
If I might ask, why the -1 for TWC?
On 10/6/05, Jason Tower <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
vonage +1
twc -1
works like a champ for me, i'm behind a wrt54gs but have not set up qos,
doesn't seem to matter much. plus it's cheaper and has more features.
easy choice imho.
Matt Pusateri wrote:
Triluggers,
I trying to decide on Vonage versus Time Warner Cable's phone service.
I have had mixed reviews on both. Anyone care to share the
experiences. From a price perspective Vonage seems more desirable,
but I don't want to end up in one of those - You get what you pay for
scenarios.
Also those that are successful in having good quality voip service do
you have the voip ATA box ahead of you local network or behind. If
behind are you doing and QOS. My setup will most likely involve a
WRTG54.
Thanks,
Matt P.
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
--
TriLUG mailing list : http://www.trilug.org/mailman/listinfo/trilug
TriLUG Organizational FAQ : http://trilug.org/faq/
TriLUG Member Services FAQ : http://members.trilug.org/services_faq/
