Richard Stallman actually has some very good points about why we shouldn't move people to GNU/Linux distributions that include non-free software. The problem is it reduces the leverage we have against those who would like to turn GNU/Linux into a Microsoft replacement (that is to turn it non-free essentially). If we attract users to GNU/Linux who don't care about freedom then companies like Atheros won't have an incentive to release free drivers/firmware.

Taking a stronger stance against less critical non-free software is something we really need more distributions to do. Then we need to focus on solving more pressing issues such as a replacement for Adobe Flash and/or alternatives to sites like Netflix which are dependent on digital restrictions and non-free software.

Reply via email to