Claiming that the GNU GPL forces any modification to be published is plain wrong. If it was so, the GPL would not even be a free software license. Given that you write that to promote alternate licenses, this is exactly what is called FUD: FUD is generally a strategic attempt to influence perception by disseminating negative and dubious or false information.

Permissive licenses are great when free standards are to be pushed... but that is not at all what you were talking about. Quite the opposite in fact. You were talking about "clients [who] want something heavily tailored to them with custom plugins or code that are not free software".

Reply via email to