-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 2013-02-23 14:27, [email protected] a écrit : > Toutatis seems to be a clear improvement over Brigantia, although > not quite sure about the "quality" term. From Brigantia onwards, > Trisquel isn't that good anymore. That's why I'm asking you to > proof-test the first "real" Release Candidate of Toutatis and > share your thoughts about it on this thread. > > Do you guys agree with me that from this release onwards, Ruben > should focus primarily on polishing/updating the LTS release, > while STS releases should be something of a side-track. I'm asking > this because I have a 2yr experience with upgrading and maintaining > the STS versions on across all the PCs except on my 2nd-one where > I focused on a pure stability with the LTS release and now I'm > decided to stick with the LTS release all the time. The STS > releases are way too buggy, not to mention Brigantia which is a > "real" catastrophe.
I agree that the LTS release should be the main focus. However, I don't understand how Brigantia, a fine release, can be labelled a "catastrophe". I use it on three different computers (a home server, my main box, and a netbook), and it really works perfectly fine as far as I am concerned. What are your issues with it? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRKSBdAAoJEIPOvYLpp5MJkAMIAMTZ6Y04EVIxqo1vIcAlf7/o 1mjFQ3WWMUIooZd7O4z9NWFkK13wNLq+fXlzSe6BzcVckkdC6fJq5fsfQ+2IQbjh M/BVV23Q6Aii/6a/fXXyC2gYTED08L/Imhep6Wm2JEV73TJmga84rU2OtoOOJZXX YBX7PV+7BCtHmkVeNzjSLHpJUV1OzfJUyrlVcz+yBQH7fCLAyCIZUuewK7CEXhQs 5FvGOomS+O03TkepOWGweVkYA8rf1AJUhFZlsUSzvDVSB+ikd0k1eo/byjEmgaAE TZUF3aCWb5m8+urtyakoIByw5ui4A+38qe6iHb2J/KzCpTnRperT1Fr3nElo0IE= =Bw5c -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
