I wouldn't compare amputation to using nonfree software. Amputation is bad because you lose some functionality of your body and necessary in some cases because it prevents serious problems from spreading. Using nonfree software is bad because you lose your freedom and maybe necessary because you need a certain function. It's rather more like needing to live in a certain freedom-hostile country for economic reasons; a less freedom-hostile country would be less bad than a more freedom-hostile country, but it would be better to not live at a freedom-hostile country at all. Hastily helping such a person move to the less freedom-hostile, but still freedom-hostile, country is not as good as attempting to help the person find a solution that doesn't involve moving to freedom-hostile countries at all.

The lesser of two evils should always be a last resort. Make sure there isn't a good choice first.

Reply via email to