"Now you come along throwing dirt at them just because there remain some tiny
problems;
recommendation of non-free software during the installation process is one of
them.
I can't consider the possibility of enabling a non-free repo which is
disabled by default as a problem, but if someone does, it has to be
considered as a tiny one.
You can install non-free software on trisquel as well; the fact that this
software doesn't "belong" to the trisquel project is just a political one
without a practical difference.
No, Debian isn't perfect, but neither is trisquel.
In trisquel, non-free Thunderbird is included for instance and we all know
about privacy issues like the google name server.
Should I "laugh at trisquel" like jxself laughed at debian because of this
minor issues?
Should I claim "trisquel doesn't care about freedom"?.
It's pure hypocrisy to do so;"
Please don't be ridiculous. How can you compare Debian's open source stance
of 20 years with Trisquel's "minor issues" (your words) which are being taken
care of?
YOU CAN'T.
https://trisquel.info/en/issues/9782
https://trisquel.info/en/issues/6456 (I'm assuming this is the issue with
Thunderbird, I've never used it).
"If Debian dies, I don't see any hope for the free software movement any
more" 0_o It's worst than i though. Please go see a therapist.
