I got it now.
Your definition of freedom is so slippery that you just call the lack of
freedom sometimes slavery, sometimes "hierarchy" or "being a team", just
which of the names suits you best in order to rationalize your behaviour.
You never provided any real arguments about the differences of the three.
I think every reader recognizes this and if you don't provide a few concrete
definitions and point out in a clear way why the animal in a tribe has
freedom because he "can try to overthrow the leadership" but people in
tyrannic countries have not, then your lack of arguments is obvious for
everyone and my work is done.
