>their campaigning seems effective to me.
I don't want shatter your sweet dreams, but can you tell me percentage of
computer users who use Trisquel?
> Put one in a leash and then unleash him.
>You will see the difference in his attitude.
You dodged the answer. Maybe I need to repeat my question. If every animal
want to be free, then how is it possible to domesticate them?
>Don't confuse these with slavery.
Slavery is a subset of hierarchy. I can prove it. Let's pretend that slavery
isn't a subset of hierarchy. Anarchistic society haven't got any hierarchy.
Thus, citizens of anarchistic country can have slaves. But, it's absurd.
Thus, because we have only two mutually exclusive options "Slavery is a
subset of hierarchy" and "Slavery isn't a subset of hierarchy", then the
option "Slavery is a subset of hierarchy" is true.
>You can find benefits in each of the three described situations
Maybe I wasn't clear. Surely, it's possible to find out positive sides in
every situation. But every situation is sum of minuses and pluses. Thus, if I
said "I can't see benefits", then you must translate it as "the sum is a
negative number or zero".
>Freedom is above all
How about "free corpse or alive slave" choice? You know, like "300 spartans".
>It's because they are reckless and act before they think
Then why Bill Gates don't use Trisquel? I don't think he is a reckless idiot.
