It could be an option that's on by default. I suspect your idea might gain more traction with them if it were suggested as something to include in LibreJS rather than something to replace it.
"I did make that suggestion on the bug-gnuzilla post. I didn't suggest it as
an extension to LibreJS, but as a replacement for it, and I suggested it as
the regular behavior, not an "option"."
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... davesamcdxv
- [Trisquel-users] JS on websites: less about visi... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... jason
- [Trisquel-users] Not being able to vet s... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code mus... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code mus... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... lloyd
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... danigaritarojas
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be... Michał Masłowski
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eli... danigaritarojas
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... superdude83
- Re: [Trisquel-users] JavaScript code must be eliminat... Andrew Roffey
