Re: [Trisquel-users] Could systemd be an inconvenient on portability?

[danigaritarojas]

> Yes, in some cases it is better to not to have portability. When there is a  
piece of free software that has no proprietary counterpart, or is by far  
technically superior to that technical counterpart, then it is usually better  
that it runs only on a fully free operating system so that is not portable.

Oh, I see what you mean. I thought you meant that there was situations where  
it wasn't good to have portability between fully free systems.