>We ARE NOT THERE YET. But are very interested in anybody willing to help
advance this area forward.
>Rather than bashing those trying to solve the "impossible" maybe we can work
together to free it!
If you promised a fully free system, the responsibility to deliver it lies
entirely in you, not the critics, and if you are unable to do so, then it is
your fault and the critics were right. Why should anyone else be responsible
to help you deliver what you promised and already charged for?.
Also, despite the fascination of society with quotes, the fact that an
assertion from a known figure is formatted as a “quote” doesn't makes it
any more valid, and often it makes it less valid, because it is taken out of
context. Clearly you are trying to appeal to emotions so that we will ignore
reason (thus committing a fallacy), but it is not going to work.
>Chris, from ThinkPenguin, who thinks we're a competitor to his revenue.
He/They have motive to spread slanderous comments about me personally, and
Purism.
That is a fallacy known as attacking the man (“argumentum ad hominem”).
If Chris has spread any actual slanderous comment (a falsehood), then please
quote him and show us how he is wrong with actual evidence. For example, you
can show us your progress in liberating the already mentioned proprietary
technologies that you already commited to free. Maybe you already freed some
of those things. That would prove that in fact, it can be done.
