He/They have motive to spread slanderous comments about me personally, and
Purism.
Here's where we are:
1. He had the same motives to do that to Gluglug (and he didn't do that).
2. He has gained respect here not only as a business guy of some semi-free
PCs, but also as a helpful member to other members.
3. You haven't done #2 (which is not a wrong thing, but....)
4. His accusations towards you will be more believed here, especially if you
don't come up with a dismantling of his accusations (which you haven't).
Actually your post I'm replying to is definitely a non-denial denial (never
mind a dismantling of his accusations).
5. Some of the things you have tried that Chris called impossible have been
abandoned - "at this rate the whole thing will eventually get abandoned", a
sensible brain would conclude. This is not about whether something is
possible/impossible - it's about whether your project is too good to be true,
considering how it really looks like something too good to be true, regarding
which......
"If it seems too good to be true, it usually is"
(Basically what I'm trying to say is that the burden is really on you to
prove what you're saying, and you don't make Chris share it simply by stating
the fact that he'd lose a larger-than-wee bit of revenue)
