1. I am not talking about the licensing of the document. I do not know if you
are trolling or sincerely do not understand. Again: someone who does her work
(e.g., write documents) through a computer program (e.g., LibreOffice)
deserves the control of her work, hence on the computer program she uses. She
is in control if and only if the program is free software.
2. And "I don't how many times I have to say it" but that is not true. I am a
developer, whereas you wrote that you cannot read source code. Yesterday, for
instance, I corrected a benign bug that made a warning be printed on the
error output in incorrect situations. And the program is not even using the
network in any way. You cannot exploit such a bug. If you have not learned,
then you should acknowledge your ignorance. If you want to learn about
security bugs, you can start with
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_bug#Taxonomy : "Security bugs
generally fall into a fairly *small* number of broad categories ...".
3. It is ethics that started the whole movement and make it popular. I see no
reason for users being put off by a speech that focuses on empowering them in
their computing lives. Only a small number of cynical people like you think
that having an ethics is ridiculous.
