1. How does she not have control over her own work? Explain? How are they
controlling her through the server, any examples? Of course developing
proprietary software is not right, because it can be used maliciously by the
company. For example, logging keystrokes, spying on data, monitoring
computer habits..etc But these things are not as important to you as
"ethics" which you can't even explain.
2. MS'f office license does not license any work she creates with it. Thats
a ridiculous statement. Regarding, her correcting bugs in the program she
uses to create her work, again I say that can fall under "security" and is
just as imporant as feature usability.
3. You have to define your principles otherwise they are just false self
righteous bigoted arguments. To me the reaosns for wanting to be able to
share software and have full control over software you own, is common sense.
And any reasons for wanting that are not more important then another. But
apparently you people claim otherwise, and by doing so hurt your own
movement.
