> But neither the game nor the source code will be available at no cost, right? so essentially, you're relying on the buyers to respect some kind of non-redistribution clause?

Fortunately that's a non-sequitur. (The conclusion does not follow from the premise.) I believe he intends to charge but won't be restricting distribution.

> IF that's the case, wouldn't that be against free software principles (I insist on the "IF")?

That's certainly true.

Reply via email to