Re: [Trisquel-users] Bitmask unmet dependancies

[greatgnu]

Yes mate. I have had this experience with bitmask. Every once in a while they  
update a package or two in their repo so every x months this can happen.. As  
a matter of fact they did it quite recently for the debian repo I was using  
and that broke a package which had a dependency on yet another package which  
is of a newer version in Debian now. After a few hours of braining myself out  
and reading stuff and contacting them a guy who is I guess one of the  
developers I sent a mail to told me I should remove the repo and purge  
bitmask and then install the standalone package, and wait for the next 0.9.0  
stable version or add the experimental repo for the next version. I opted for  
the stable standalone.