This may not be what you meant, but it seems like you're saying that if software is not developed using an "open source" method, "open source proponents use proprietary software". I've never heard of anyone actually doing this. Some people will use a proprietary program when there are no free code alternatives, or when those that are available do not work reliably. Some people are most purist, and will accept a less useful computing experience rather than make this compromise. This is a tactical decision, and generally has more to do with how long people have been using libre software, and how well they understand the arguments for it, than whether they use the language of "free software", "open source", or use both interchangeably. The more free code software applications there are, the more reliable and user-friendly they are, the less reason there is for anyone to compromise. Putting our energy into helping this happen is far more fruitful than hassling people about about their choices of words.

Reply via email to