I don't really understand your point here. You say governments are the problem, but surely private power is worse, in that it has even less accountability to the population? It is contradictory to talk about liberty yet make these points. I'm not really sure how people's physical appearance in relation to their political ideology is relevant either to political movements and discussion, or even accurate at all. If they are scared then in all honesty, I don't particularly blame them. Left-wing political movements have had a long history of political suppression and censorship, especially in totalitarian states such as the Soviet Union. The fact that the environment is just being destroyed is utterly scary too. Regarding limiting your life to be free, certainly many people have to make compromise. You can make personal choices about this. Many people here reject things like Facebook because they feel it limits freedoms, albeit not being able to use it with other people who are on it. But some people would argue real human contact is infinitely better than a spyware messaging service. Seriously, what are you running from? In free society, political persecution is rare; freedom of speech is a tangible thing. Free software is for everyone, is accessible, reliable, and easy to use. You should not need to be a dissident, or political reporter to run it. If you are, then of course you benefit from things like Tor, as do we all. Regarding proprietary applications, we are not saying you should ever be prevented from running some proprietary program. It is your computer, and as long as you do not make other people use it, it is your problem. You are only hurting yourself. Rather, we believe that nobody should be forced to run proprietary software. That is just morally wrong; you are exerting unjust authority over another human being. > But what is coming with Social Security going bust 2017 in US, EU and Euro is going to collapse No. This is an unsubstantiated claim. There is no evidence supporting this statement. It could happen, but war and climate disaster would have reached us already if this were to happen suddenly. There are other issues regarding global economy, but you are missing the fact that the governments have deep pockets. There would be too much of an outcry to make it collapse suddenly as you suggest. Really, I think we are going off on a tangent here. I will make a new thread in the "Troll Hole".

Reply via email to