Here in Brazil we have the consumer defense code, which has articles
against tying.

However, this is a subjective right, not an objective right. This means
that, it does exist by law, but only applies if the party involved wants
to exercise it. If it would be objective, perhaps no redistributor would
do tying.

In the case of Brazil, the consumer can request that the manufacturer
(not the vendor/redistributor) removes the tied software from the
computer with no cost. However, the consumer must-not accept the terms
that come along with the tied software, in order to be legally capable
of exercising the right.

Besides, it seems that most Brazilians don't exercise this right because
they acquire the hardware when the situation is desperate, or because
they fear that exercising it might take time and money (which in most
cases it does, specially if you have to pay for transportation of the
product back and forth).

On top of it, if the consumer takes it back to the vendor/redistributor
instead of delivering it to the manufacturer and request for untying,
the vendor/redistributor might just do the untying himself, but this is
worse because it doesn't educate the manufacturer to respond
appropriately for these cases, besides, the vendor/redistributor might
void the warranty doing so.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to